I talked to Larry Hamm about a comment made by Alan Greenspan. The beginning is the same as part 2, but the segment after the clip is further into the conversation where I go on a little rant about patriotism.
Michael T. McPhearson, a native of Fayetteville North Carolina was a field artillery officer in the 24th Mechanized Infantry Division during Desert Shield /Desert Storm, also known as Gulf War I. Michael joined the Army Reserve 1981 as an enlisted soldier at the age of 17 and attended basic training the summer between his junior and senior high school years. He is a ROTC graduate of Campbell University in Buies Creek, North Carolina. His military career includes 6 years of reserve service and 5 years active duty service. He separated from active duty in 1992 as a Captain.
Now living in Newark, New Jersey, Michael is currently the National Coordinator for United for Peace and Justice. He is a former Executive Director of Veterans For Peace.
His volunteer social and economic justice activist work includes membership in Veterans For Peace, the Newark based People's Organization for Progress, Military Families Speak Out, the American Civil Liberties Union and the former coordinating committee member for the Bring Them Home Now campaign against the U.S. occupation of Iraq and Secretary of the Saint Louis Branch of the NAACP. Michael is the publisher of the McPhearsonReport.com.
Michael's son joined the Army in January 2004 and served one tour in Iraq. He separated from the military in 2007.
In December of 2003 Michael returned to Iraq as part of a peace delegation to examine the state of the occupation firsthand. He has also traveled widely within the United States and to Istanbul Turkey and Bologna Italy as a speaker on the U.S. peace movement and world peace.
Good discussion about an important topic that ahrdly anyone talks about. One economist said that the Fed could play a role in pushing for all these billions to be invested,by charging banks a fee for holding the money. Right now, they get a small interest payment, so the incentive is not strong. Is it also a chance to sabotage the economy to get rid of Obama? to reduce the wages and rights of workers even more? other similar motives?/
Good discussion about an important topic that ahrdly anyone talks about. One economist said that the Fed could play a role in pushing for all these billions to be invested,by charging banks a fee for holding the money. Right now, they get a small interest payment, so the incentive is not strong. Is it also a chance to sabotage the economy to get rid of Obama? to reduce the wages and rights of workers even more? other similar motives?/