Xenophobes, the Christian Taliban, Plutocrats and Oligarchs (Why Romney Stokes My Fears)

It’s true that Governor Romney and President Obama belong to the ruling class and act more in the interest of wealthy elites than in mine. Consequently, no matter who wins, many of the issues I hold dear will remain fundamentally unaddressed. The U.S. imperial war machine will keep chugging along killing the innocent and not so innocent. Poverty and challenges facing the most vulnerable will continue to be rhetorically deplored but conspicuously underfunded. The economy will continue to lumber forward with the rich doing well, the middle-class being squeezed and the poor being crushed. For these reasons, I plan to vote for a third way and a new vision for our nation in the Green Party’s Jill Stein. But we all know that either Obama or Romney will be the next president. I do not want Romney to win because I believe he has cobbled together a coalition that represents the most reactionary elements in national politics. There is a strong undercurrent of xenophobia and hate running through the Republican Party. They have an “us vs. them” narrative for most all of the nation’s challenges. They blame a swath of groups including teachers, unions, poor people, people of color, feminist, immigrants, Islam, and homosexuals for the slow economy, the national debt and all things gone wrong. The party’s vision is backward looking, championing a return to an imagined past America; a more racist, sexist, homophobic and White America. The Republican Party is the home of theocrats for which the separation of church and state is a nuisance. They lead the charge to end access to abortion, limit rights of lesbian, gays, bi sexual transgendered and queer people, deny important precepts of science and seek to imprint their version of Christian values into U.S. law (thoroughly misrepresenting the teachings of Jesus in the process). But today the people who may be the most important in helping Governor Romney are a specific set of plutocrats and oligarchs who are pouring money into his campaign. Although both Obama and Romney are supported by the ruling class, a number of them have decided to back Romney because they believe President Obama is encouraging class envy and warfare. Some have gone so far as to claim he is promoting socialism. These views appear to be most prevalent among the ultra-rich. Of course this is absurd, but it speaks to their narrow understanding of socialism and their inflated sense of worth and entitlement. A New Yorker magazine article titled “Super Rich Irony: Why do billionaires feel victimized by Obama?” does an excellent job outlining their thinking. The piece by Chrystia Freeland quotes  among others Omega Advisor hedge fund founder Leon Cooperman, a Bronx-born, sixty-nine-year-old billionaire as saying, “Our problem, frankly, is as long as the President remains anti-wealth, anti-business, anti-energy, anti-private-aviation, he will never get the business community behind him. The problem and the complication is the forty or fifty percent of the country on the dole that support him.” Instead of acknowledging their accumulation of wealth as a combination of their ingenuity, hard work, good fortune and a helping hand or encouragement from parents, teachers and mentors, Mr. Cooperman and the business community he claims to speak for appear to believe that they are self-made, rich solely due to their talents. They convey feelings of entitlement. They are the creators and the "forty or fifty percent" are takers. They dismiss the fact that their businesses are kept running by the sweat, blood and tears of the workers and dedicated experts who know their jobs inside and out. They ignore the fact that they need working class people, who toil and struggle to take care of their families, to buy their products. They take for granted all the advantages provided by the U.S. market including the most efficient worker in the world, highly developed infrastructure and magnet for global talent. This quote from a letter to President Obama from Mr. Cooperman exposes the depth of his arrogance, "As a group we employ many millions of taxpaying people, pay their salaries, provide them with healthcare coverage, start new companies, found new industries, create new products, fill store shelves at Christmas, and keep the wheels of commerce and progress (and indeed of government, by generating the income whose taxation funds it) moving.” Yes he wrote fill store shelves at Christmas and progress moving. In his minds they keep the world on its axis. I don't know for sure if Romney agrees with this wing of the ruling class. Who knows what Romney believes? He is like a blank slate ready to say what he thinks you need to hear. But I suspect he does. His taped comments about the forty-seven percent who see themselves as victims and are dependent on government echoing Cooperman's sentiment is well known. I am most disturbed by his comment on the tape that these people "believe that they are entitled to healthcare, to food, to housing."

Ayn Rand

I believe as a society we have a responsibility to provide healthcare and end hunger and homelessness. His view is one of leaving people behind because as takers they deserve nothing better. Romney's pick of Paul Ryan is another indicator of his belief in this worldview. Ryan and many of these self-proclaimed self-made businessmen are devoted admirers of Ayn Rand, champion of ethical egoism, the belief that moral agents ought to do what is in their own self-interest. This is the opposite of my belief in ethical altruism, which holds that moral agents have an obligation to help and serve others. That is the ideal, but as a practical matter I realize most people act somewhere in between. Ethical egoism allows the individual to rationalize all actions as just because the act is in the persons best interest, never mind the suffering caused by that action. Therefore we have these unapologetic moneyed men who charge Obama with socialism and have not been held accountable for nearly destroying the world economy with their greed. They believe their genius brought prosperity and the crash is the unfortunate and unavoidable price paid for growth. Just let us loose and we will bring prosperity (to ourselves) again. Ironically during the Obama Administration, these men have done much better than the average person. Emmanuel Saez a University of California, Berkeley economist has crunched numbers that show in2010, the top 1% of earners took in 93% of all income gains leaving 7% to be shared by the rest of us.  But because the President wants to establish baseline accountability and asks them to invest in the nation's future, they cry foul and off with his head. I see these men as the greatest threat to our economy and liberty. Their disrespect and apparent disdain for the working class drives policies that concentrate wealth. Their adherence to ethical egoism can lead them to follow any course they believe will keep them in power because they believe the world needs them in power to prosper, the divine right of wealth. Industrialist such as these men acting in their perceived self-interest supported Hitler, not necessarily because they were anti-Semitic or wanted to conquer Europe, but because they thought they could control him to forward their own interests. In 1936 powerful American business men with the same mentality and feeling threatened by President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s policies asked Major General Smedley Butler to head a coup to overthrow the U.S. government. Fortunately for the Republic Butler outed the plot to a special Congressional committee. While I understand much will not change under a Romney or a second Obama Administration some things will. The forces supporting Romney represent more than the greater of two evils. A Romney win will give momentum to xenophobes, the Christian Taliban and unfettered capitalism driven by egotistical capitalists. This coalition embraces hate and fear as central organizing tools. The ascendency of this coalition to the highest office in the land is the first step to take “this country back” as they say, to what I see as a hybrid Confederacy and 1950’s, undercutting gains under Republicans and Democrats since the Civil War. Remember, State’s Rights was a Southern argument to protect slavery, not Republican. While the Democrat Party has too many flaws to mention here, on whole the people who support Democrats represent the spirit of human struggle against oppression, hate and fear. While the party has not rid itself of these evils, there are plenty of people working to do so. I stand with them. Far too many of Romney’s supporters are embracing bigotry, misogyny and a servitude form of capitalism. It is the same mentality my ancestors and activist before me struggled against. I must recognize it for what it is and also stand against it. For these reasons, I will be relieved Wednesday morning if Obama wins and in some distress if he loses.
Print Friendly
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

About Michael T. McPhearson

Currently Michael is executive director of Veterans For Peace and co-chair of the Don't Shoot Coalition, A Saint Louis based coalition that formed in the aftermath of Michael Brown's police killing death in Ferguson, MO. From August 2010 to September 2013, Michael worked as the National Coordinator with United For Peace and Justice. He is a former board member of Veterans For Peace and as well as Executive Director from 2005 to 2010. He works closely with the Newark based People’s Organization for Progress and the Saint Louis centered Organization for Black Struggle. Michel also publishes the Mcphearsonreport.org expressing his views on war and peace, politics, human rights, race and other things. Michael also launched Reclaimthedream.org website as an effort to change the discourse and ignite a new conversation about Dr. Martin Luther King’s message and what it means to live in just and peaceful communities.